I enjoyed that book. Really apropos reading in these times, an interest examination of “post truth” ideas.

I read the article, but nothing can convince me the discord execs aren’t purely thinking of how ways to further enshittify.

It applies. The Microsoft requirements are different than the standard requirements. Stricter in some ways, but more lenient in others.

It’s like Infinite Jest, just an alternate timeline.

He’s not saying this because he has influence with Microsoft directly. He’s doing it because he’s Brian Eno and he will be heard, and because of the respect he’s earned amongst his peers, he will be heard by people with even louder voices. So Microsoft and other companies and consumers will hear. Hopefully with enough acts like this, companies are shamed enough that it affects their bottom lines enough that they stop supporting genocide.

I have a lifetime nebula. I’m probably about 2/3 of the way to it being positive value, but it’s such a good service that I don’t mind.

I really wish dropout had a lifetime option.

I’m confident leadership whipped the votes hard on this one, probably as a futile show of unity. That’s where the blame lies.

It would indeed be nice to see a few democrats resisting attacks on the constitution and such but in the house a small number of voices cannot block legislation like in the senate.

I would also like to hear an explanation from AOC just to understand the politics of not acting as the singular democratic “no” vote here. But I’m not going to hold her to task given the obvious failure of leadership.

I switched back to VLC a while ago after trying others. Not fancy, but it tends to just work.

Yeah for sure. And regardless, I know some great security engineers who are ADHD.

It’s yet another systemic issue, reflective of wider systemic issues. It’s not helpful to place the blame or demands on individuals.

In 10 it was possible to turn it all off and leave it off. In 11 it’s almost impossible to do so.

This seems unfairly dismissive of someone who’s proved themselves time and again. The article might not be about what you wish it was about but it’s insightful about the topic it covers.

In that case, I suggest you stop throwing dirt at GN.

Activity Pub is a very popular way to decentralize.

With political uncertainty around centralized meteorological data infrastructure, it makes sense to continue the process of decentralization. The underlying APIs can be changed in the future if needed.

Peer review is false security, so much bad and fraudulent science gets through, but due to the stamp of authority people are less skeptical. Additionally it’s harder to publish good science.

There’s a lot of people who understand this better than me who can explain it. Here’s one starting point. https://www.experimental-history.com/p/the-rise-and-fall-of-peer-review

GPT 1 and 2 were both more open than later releases. However I’m not sure any are fully FOSS.

This is just a standard prompt hack. This will always exist with llms. They don’t have any real understanding of language so safety protocols can’t actually ban topics, only sets of words and phrases.

There was an extensive set of prompts working toward elder abuse before the result in question.

My guess is that the redditor who discovered it disguised it to look like homework and reproduced the hack, and added the “brother” to create more authentic rage bait.

Any thoughts from less bigoted creators would be welcome. Not in the mood to watch anything with this person.

Yes, but this issue is not one we should want Google solving. We need better media literacy education throughout life.

Twilight works pretty well