guess what I’m wearing under my socks

Idk if it’s content blocking on my end but I can’t tell you how upset I am that the article had no pictures of the contraption or a video of it in action.

I’d heard a fairly novel idea about farming trees and burying them as pulp in old mines, I’m sure it’s just ASKING for some kind of wild underground mine fire but … similar concept

Three classes of 9th graders being “shown how to use the internet” in 2001:

Librarian: what’s a good example of a good site to visit

Student: what about the white houses webpage

Librarian: yes, so does anyone know what that webpage is?

Student: WhiteHouse.com?

Librarian: that sounds about right, let’s check!

The 4th trip to the local hardware store is cuz you can’t be seen back at Lowe’s / home despot for a 4th time today.

Look up pykrete, it’s actually a really cool material

It also wasn’t and isn’t that crazy of an idea.

It’s strong AF, buoyant, and you can repair it at sea using the ocean around you.

You just need a reliable way to keep it cool.

here I’d call it tomato or tomato.

It’s pronounced tomato

The term fatphobia in general always irked me, it’s a co-opting of phobias usage with homophobia and feels like it’s trying to elevate itself to that level.

I used to smoke, so I’m extra judgey.

don’t kink shame my dude

It’ll be in yer phone

Cigarettes

Hi. I’m you. It’s weird reading something so fucking … exact.

I’m sorry you went through that.

My ex wife made a claim that I hit her. She thought it would help her win the divorce.

Officially I have to check the box on forms saying yes I have in fact EVER been charged with domestic violence.

I’m the only person involved with a memory of the event she made up, because I have to maintain records of it and charges being dropped and everything. For work.

Investigators ask me, I have to say yes. I describe the situation and what happened and they give me the side eye “yeah sure ok, wife beater” and then my ex-wife doesn’t even remember the situation.

The good news is I have sole custody of our child. A judge saw the real of it when it mattered.

Part of this, even if Luigi did nothing and shouldn’t be in jail in the first place for something someone else did, is the culprit in that murder was caught on camera acting with intent and there is no hearsay about what happened.

Gabagool over here

I was misremembering something I’d read before, but obviously yes it’s the other thing you’re saying.

I believe that Luigi himself does not refute the act currently.

I might be wrong, but if Luigi isn’t refuting what he allegedly did then 🤷

I misremembered, he did plead not-guilty. I’d thought I read a legal theory of justified self defense as the strategy.

The hazards are to indicate you are stopped and now a hazard.

Only when you are stopped and now a hazard. Your car becomes a blinking light. We have road rules for blinking lights, so it SHOULD be saying one specific thing.

Thank you for coming to this road safety talk.