Wonder how the survey was sent out and whether that affected sampling.

Regardless, with -3-4k responses, that’s disappointing, if not concerning.

I only have a more personal sense for Lemmy. Do you have a source for Lemmy gender diversity?

Anyway, what do you think are the underlying issues? And what would be some suggestions to the community to address them?

I use gitlab ci mainly and dabble in github actions. Can you clarify how “Not even Github managed to pull that off”? IIRC, actions is quite featureful and it’s open-source, so I assume that can be run with self-hosted runners as well.

You can also just post the 4-5 data items without claiming that this is low or high credibility or bias. Then let the people make the decision. Like this maybe:

“Based on source X, this source media bias is:

• bias: A
• cred: B

Methodology of X is at: “

sounds like this can be a plot of a new Pixar movie

I’m also curious. A quick search came up with these. Not sure which one is most reliable/updated

• https://www.comparitech.com/blog/information-security/global-ransomware-attacks/
• https://www.comparitech.com/ransomware-attack-map/
• https://cissm.liquifiedapps.com/
• https://cybermap.kaspersky.com/special/ransomware

Many things are called “AI models” nowadays (unfortunately due to the hype). I wouldn’t dismiss the tools and methodology yet.

That said, the article (or the researchers) did a disservice to the analysis by not including a link to the report (and code) that outlines the methodology and how the distribution of similarities look. I couldn’t find a link in the article and a quick search didn’t turn up anything.

you should try to ask the same question using xAI / Grok if possible. May also ask ChatGPT about Altman as well

welp, guess you’re right. It’s not common but not just a few someone’s either.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human–animal_breastfeeding

tell me more about the “almost” part …

Lol ads that can be engineered into DNA, so that they can be passed down for generations.

hm, I think I’ve been doing it wrong then …

someone should make an alternate history tv show where the ship made it. bonus if it’s of a parody kind.

doesn’t seem to be so comfortable with glasses, esp with a hoodie unfortunately

I believe experiments like these should move slower and with more scrutiny. As in more animal testing before moving on to humans, esp. due to the controversies surrounding Neuralink’s last animal experiments.

I think porn generation (image, audio and video) will eventually be very realistic and very easy to make with only a few clicks and some well crafted prompts. Things would just be a whole other level that what Photoshop used to be.

re: your last point, AFAIK, the TLDR bot is also not AI or LLM; it uses more classical NLP methods for summarization.

If you suspect that it’s been modified, try going to places like the internet archive or archivetoday to check. The claims you’ve made seem big, so back them up with sources.

Is there a database tracking companies that start out with good intentions and then eventually gets bought out or sells out their initial values? I’m wondering what the deciding factors are, and how long it takes for them to turn.

Daredevil (the design and music is sick) and The Morning Show (the animation is very captivating to me)

Reminds me of this article https://www.alexmurrell.co.uk/articles/the-age-of-average where the author pulls in different examples of designs and aesthetics converging to some “average”.

I’m feeling conflicted with these trends, on one hand it seems like things are becoming more accessible, while on another, feels like a loss.

This especially may be relevant with generative AI - at least for the very few generative arts I look at, at some point they start to feel the same, impersonal.