In Australia they’re now called ‘intentional communities’. That might help with searching. Some are religious but some are not. Quite a few are just science/sustainability based.

Man knows his fallacies! Excellent. This bodes well for interesting discussion!

I, too, am interested in having serious good faith discussions, and will not become shrill if you present nuanced views, or criticism of mine.

Me fast forwarding through the underwater stuff so I don’t have to hold my breath. Might get the books for the same reason.

Hence the job title ‘prompt engineer’ I guess. If you know about Soylent Green, AI is people!

No I like yours better.

I want to have your children. In the nicest possible way.

What about semantics?

“Nothing is better than cake."

“But bread is better than nothing.

"Does that mean that bread is better than cake?”

Top o’ the mornin’ to ya. Clippy O’Pilot at yer service.

Is that her? She looks like a hallucination.

Enshittification. Every human who uses computers on a daily basis needs to understand this word.

Anything that starts with ‘aww’

We donate to Wikipedia once per year.

One of my favourites is “Christ on a bike!” because it’s so hilarious.

“has a model of how words relate to each other, but does not have a model of the objects to which the words refer.

It engages in predictive logic, but cannot perform syllogistic logic - reasoning to a logical conclusion from a set of propositions that are assumed to be true”

Is this true of all current LLMs?

Thank you for replying. This is the level of info I used to love on Reddit and now love on Lemmy.

Thanks for your reply, I appreciate the correction and the info.

The thing that strikes me about LLMs is that they have been created to chat. To converse. They’re partly influenced by Turing tests where the objective is to convince someone you’re human by keeping up a conversation. They weren’t designed to create meaningful content or factual content.

People still seem to want to use chat GPT to create something, and fix the accuracy as a second step. I say go back to the drawing board and create a tool that analyses statements and tries to create information based on trusted linked open data sources.

Discuss :)

Absolutely. Do you remember the herp derp extension that would turn them all into ‘herp derp herp derp’ so that you wouldn’t have to read them?

Ah, the positive characteristics of people who are early adopters of new technology, and capable of navigating their way onto a system where signing up wasn’t trivial. Seems to be highly correlated with language skills like spelling, grammar and vocabulary. I recognise my privilege.