

Can we like, agree that throwing Mollies at non-combatants is shit?
Can we like, agree that throwing Mollies at non-combatants is shit?
Enough reason to not engage with a person.
There is no doctrine condemning you to punishment for not being naked.
Yes, feminists want to force people to be naked in public, as seen in the feminist Republic of Iran. Oh wait no, people got beaten to death for not wearing a veil there.
Banning this is as dumb as mandating it.
Take away his wheelchair. God didn’t want him to walk, he should crawl.
Fuck me, I really covet my neighbor’s ass :/
I do not see the connection between “The discourse has changed” and “you get fooled by hypocritical politicians”.
For the first time in ages, media outlets are openly questioning our stance on Israel. Talks of cutting off the weapons supply are fucking happening.
I hope not. For the first time in years, the discourse around Israel has shifted. Like, 2 weeks ago, Members of the CDU got grilled on their attitude towards Israel and its renewed attacks at prime time on national television. This is unprecedented. I really think there is a shift in public discourse on Gaza.
Obligatory fuck the Staatsräson.
Thanks, Batko
It’s trying to prevent state judges from challenging that law.
Reinvaded those territories and did standard roman stuff. Executing and enslaving the inhabitants of Jerusalem.
The guy is once again professing his love for Hitler. This song is normalizing the Usage of Heil Hitler. How the fuck do you not see that?
This EO fits into a larger pattern of targeting minorities under the banner of “fixing DEI”. The original point of your argument, however, was that this admin does not try to erase trans people.
"The left-wing gender insanity being pushed at our children is an act of child abuse. Very simple. Here’s my plan to stop the chemical, physical and emotional mutilation of our youth,” Trump said about Trans Kids.
This entire EO he put out on Day one is entirely about erasing trans people without even mentioning them as “trans”. Kicking them out of the military is another step towards this goal of ultimately banning them from every facet of life.
I don’t see it as an insult, it is used as one. Especially by this admin.
It’s the idea that some is only there because of DEI and without it, their capabilities wouldn’t have been enough. Which is wrong.
Before DEIA was implemented, minorities were often not hired, because of their background, even though they were the more capable candidate. And this admin is a perfect example, that “DEI hire”" is projection.
Is Hegseth more capable than his predecessor? Gods no. His signal escapades are enough to prove this.
Is RKJ more capable than his predecessor? Is anyone in this majority white, majority male admin better suited for their job than the more diverse admin before it? No. But still, that admin gets labeled as DEI Hires, not because anyone could prove that DEI prevented a more deserving candidate from filling that position, but because they belong to minorities.
First of all, DEI includes things like posting job offerings in spaces that are frequented by lower income or minority populations. It’s rejection includes an assumption that the most qualified person for any given position is a white straight man.
People in this Admin have called the former secretary of defense a DEI hire. She was a Black General.
This admin has consistently called any minority a DEI hire and has tried to blame accidents on said “DEI” hires.
Given how much of Tech bro ideology is informed by types like Nick Land and Curtis Yarvin, no there isn’t.
Do not mention the “Nanking Incident”.
No.