

That’s not even convincing pedantery. Nobody would assune that a browser’s standard style might be an RFC, IETF- or in any way official standard,
That’s not even convincing pedantery. Nobody would assune that a browser’s standard style might be an RFC, IETF- or in any way official standard,
I don’t think. You can’t prove I do! Leave me alone. You’re one of them! I knew it all the time.
Yes , I can read books. I even read one or two of the 1200 around me. Those with the fuckpics and some of the funnier ones, like “Phänomenologie des Geistes” by Hegel. I wouldn’t have if they had been layouted using browser standards.
ASCII?! Useless, modern witchcraft! Devils work! Give me CCITT-1 or give me death!
Oh, come on. You really want some at least readable output. Things like image borders, consistently positioned images/diagrams, line breaks and page borders. Some whitespace and indentations, too. You just can’t read a couple of pages full of unformatted raw text without massive eye fatigue. I’m all for dumping JS and excessive frameworks, I’d prefer well-formed XHTML over any of that clients-side scripted crap, but totally rejecting CSS is pointless zealotry.
CSS on the other hand is quite essential to separate layout from content. Which is a good thing, so I can’t really think of a reason for a “no-CSS” rule. Specifically if you can use inline styles as well but in a way more messy way.
Who cares? Protestants are heretics who will burn in hell anyway. Because god hates them. Not that I’d give a fuck but it seems they do. 😁
Great plan. Even better than I thought.
Not even in the days of the cold war there was remotely enough bunker capacity for everyone. What for anyway? Want to spend the next 100 or 1000 years in a subterranean hole? Good luck with that. Waste of money and resources but probably just the pipe dreams of some beaurocrat in a mostlly irrelevant institution.
Tsss… Firefox, NoScript, Ublock origin and Tracker control (via f-droid.org). Also actively cursing trackers’ employees, their wives, children, houses and pets using tradited ancient Roman ban curses. (Yes, I am speaking Latin. And I do have a black cat.)
I’d recommend Dr. Ramones’ therapeutic procedure.
There are no oceans made of sodium and water. There couldn’t even be because sodium and water would react to NaOH and H3O+. There are oceans of water and sodium chlorate because smart people are made from chlorine…
Abilities are a Chinese hoax anyway. Do I have any abilities? Do you? Told you so. Hoax.
Maybe it’s not safe. They might just react like sodium and water, who could tell?
Obviously Austrian terrorist activity (ATA). They secretly want their colony (French Austria) back. Ceterum censeo austriam delendam esse.
Du mich auch.
Some people’s crisis is other people’s chance. Some people just aren’t productive - they can’t shine in a productive or just constructive environment. They are attracted by anything rotten, deeply troubled, just the kind of work where intrigues, brown nosing and opportunism are rewarded and productivity doesn’t count.
#! /usr/bin/bash
PATH=/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin
eject -r
deleted by creator
Yes. I think we’re missing each other pinpointing details while meaning the same. Every browser has it’s defaut or “standard” style, nowadays even adapting to the system theme and trying to guess if to use day or night settings etc. Nevertheless it won’t break lines in a reasonable way, won’t deal with footnotes in an acceptable way and either break the layout of pure text pages or the layout of illustrated pages. HTML5 makes these specific things somewhat better as it allows realtively advanced document structure but nevertheless, a few lines of CSS to reflect at least the prinipial character of the document are unlikely to hurt anyone in a worse way than a one-style-fits-all layout for everything will hurt tha vast majority.