To follow this up. Do you need a physicist’s opinion?

-Making a watch: No
-Making a watch for space: Yes

-Making fireworks: No
-Making a nuclear bomb: Yes

Yeah well, they can pipe up when their reality shattering edge cases actually start occurring. Until then, good enough is good enough.

I miss you George Carlin.

“Is it done, Yuri?”

“No, Comrade President, it has only begun.”

How can anyone make money off porn if users simply create their own?

What, you mean like amateur porn or…?

Seems like professional porn still does great after over two decades of free internet porn so…

I guess they will solve this one the same way, by having better production quality. 🤷

Some tunnels where I live explicitly instruct you to adjust your AC before entering.

I’m allowed to adjust anything within arms reach as long as I keep my eyes on the road. It is my responsibility to familiarize myself with the controls before departing so I can do so.

You’ve never driven in a humid tunnel, or live in a place with changing weather do you?

Safety Squints™ engaged!

Well… it’s a video game. We also call them “CPU” which is also entirely inaccurate.

THANK YOU! I’ve been saying this a long time, but have just kind of accepted that the definition of AI is no longer what it was.

True, edited.

Law opens for supplier to charge money, if necessary to support the service, which is what Meta is doing.

However, fuck Meta.

Ok. /s

I’m sure I can name many examples of things I observed as dangerous, and the observation being correct. But sure, claim unilateral ignorance and dismiss anyone who don’t agree with your view.

You can make an observation that something is dangerous without intimate knowledge of its internal mechanisms.

Luckily, he’s not the one making them!