The Edge of who gives a fuck?

I’m Commander Shepard and this is my favorite bidet on the Citadel.

Like those damn nuclear reactors!

Obligatory Meatloaf

There’s no place like ::1

Bidet gang rise up sit down!

Kinda surprised this doesn’t have more upvotes considering it seems that it continues to be a massive security vulnerability.

I’m gonna hazard a guess at dd

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dd_(Unix)

Back to the Future lied to me again!

IPv4.

IPv6 became a recognized standard by 1998.

EDIT: https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html#tab=ipv6-adoption

Nearly 30 years later, and less than half of the connections to Google are via IPv6.

Pickled asparagus and pepperoncinis.

Doesn’t that have more to do with Gamepass eating game studios’ lunch though? And a lot less with AI? Just regular ol’ dumbass management decisions.

Microsoft probably were thinking “He’s just making another Daikatana, anyway.”

No, the graphics from Intel back in 07-10 were crap.

What are you using graphics on a server for instead of just CLI?

You just can’t buy too old or the inverse happens and the performance per watt drops. I think you’re right that 2012 is about the cutoff. Maybe 2007 for certain items, like my 2007 iMac. But if you’re getting back to the Pentium 4 era you’ve gone too far and need to turn back around.

Hell yuh.

And literally the first sentence in my comment addressed that chucklefuck you’re not being clever you’re just being a gotcha-seeking asshole.

And why does a post on lemmy.world have have a blahaj URL when I look at it? Is my server making a copy?

Yes, it is, and you’re looking at a local version of it. For Blahaj especially this matter as blahaj doesn’t federate downvotes, so you never see downvotes on the blahaj version of a post.

I do feel bad for anyone who was affected by this who did not support Trump and his dismantling of the weather services that could have prevented this.

However, for anyone who was affected who voted for Trump and supported his dismantling of said programs? Fuck around, find out.

Counterpoint: When Louis CK (prior to being outed as a sex pest) released one of his comedy specials on his website DRM-free for $5 he became a millionaire almost overnight.

https://boingboing.net/2011/12/22/drm-free-experiment-makes-loui.html

Price point matters, too.

It also jives with early Steam Sales when Valve would cut titles like Left 4 Dead Counter Strike down to 90% off, and they would sell so many digital copies that they were actually making more money off the lower price.

https://www.geekwire.com/2011/experiments-video-game-economics-valves-gabe-newell/

Now we did something where we decided to look at price elasticity. Without making announcements, we varied the price of one of our products. We have Steam so we can watch user behavior in real time. That gives us a useful tool for making experiments which you can’t really do through a lot of other distribution mechanisms. What we saw was that pricing was perfectly elastic. In other words, our gross revenue would remain constant. We thought, hooray, we understand this really well. There’s no way to use price to increase or decrease the size of your business.

But then we did this different experiment where we did a sale. The sale is a highly promoted event that has ancillary media like comic books and movies associated with it. We do a 75 percent price reduction, our Counter-Strike experience tells us that our gross revenue would remain constant. Instead what we saw was our gross revenue increased by a factor of 40. Not 40 percent, but a factor of 40. Which is completely not predicted by our previous experience with silent price variation. …

Then we decided that all we were really doing was time-shifting revenue. We were moving sales forward from the future. Then when we analyzed that we saw two things that were very surprising. Promotions on the digital channel increased sales at retail at the same time, and increased sales after the sale was finished, which falsified the temporal shifting and channel cannibalization arguments. Essentially, your audience, the people who bought the game, were more effective than traditional promotional tools. So we tried a third-party product to see if we had some artificial home-field advantage. We saw the same pricing phenomenon. Twenty-five percent, 50 percent and 75 percent very reliably generate different increases in gross revenue.