

Just change the one letter.
Just change the one letter.
As long as they perceive that they’re hurting their targets more than they hurt themselves, they’ll make that sacrifice.
That’s capitalism.
Liars? No, it can’t be.
Looks like you tried to do bullet points? You have to put a space after the hyphen.
Someone opened the fourth box. Am I supposed to feel bad about this?
And those three “brands” are all from the same company, who most certainly just gets them from SE Asia, they probably all come out of the exact same sweatshop.
He owns DoJ. He owns Congress. He owns SCOTUS. People and organizations can sue them all they want, wait and wait through all the delays - oh, but in the meantime, they’ll drag their opponents into criminal court on some made up shit.
At least for now they still have to take Court seriously.
They already don’t take the Court seriously. This is justified, as evidenced by their flouting Court orders with no repercussions, or running them up to the SCOTUS they own. Even if by some fluke they’re actually held accountable and bow to the Court when they disagree, they can just delay until the Court’s opinion is irrelevant, while they continue to do what they want right now.
They still have to pay court fees.
Eventually, which they will just put off forever.
They have to spend time defending themselves.
This is their job. Like how you and I have our jobs to go to, this is theirs.
They have to pay lawyers and outside counsel and deposition fees and a dozen other legal costs.
They just don’t pay, or if they ever do, not nearly as much as they said they would, and as the literal government, they just do it with the taxes collected from you and not from their own pockets. (Which, by the way, are certainly already being lined from that same tax pool.)
They have to spend time on depositions and giving testimony.
This is the same as the previous “time” statement. Again, this is their job.
Their job is to *take, right now, and delay. As long as they can delay, run another scheme to take more, and delay on that one, too. It’s like a Ponzi scheme of corruption. You know it. They know it. We all know it.
Watching people think the courts are still effective is darkly funny.
There’s a bubble of aging people who need to be supported by younger people. Fewer younger people means declining options for everyone.
Except those rich people, who are going to find it more easy to exploit the remaining, more desperate workers.
Nah, they need to be executed. If it’s legal for them to say gay people should be executed, it’s legal for me to say they should be executed.
If they refuse to feel shame, make them feel fear.
One man’s extortion is another man’s bribery.
I just unloaded most of my defense ammo in preparation for going to the range tonight.
Of course they learned something! That they can do that.
Definitely - there are lots of reasons why abortion needs to be legal; I was only running down one avenue.
You’re not wrong, but if the law says “legal until viable”, then that physician’s decision must be reviewable in court. Which means that no physician is going to sign off on “not viable” and put themselves at legal risk.
This is why the law should just say “legal”, full stop. (e: I just realized that you also used the phrase “full stop.” I promise I was not trying to be snarky, it just came out.)
“Viability” can even be quite fuzzy, because it all depends on the capabilities of medical science, and even then there’s a gray area. And who gets to decide whether a fetus that tests for a given birth defect is “viable”? Does “viable” mean that the fetus can be forced to have a heartbeat outside of the womb, even if they have to be cared for in a vegetative state forever?
Gideons, with the Bibles.