

Only applicable if they run the servers themselves, not if they let others run their own servers.
Cryptography nerd
Fediverse accounts;
Natanael@slrpnk.net (main)
Natanael@infosec.pub
Natanael@lemmy.zip
Lemmy moderation account: @TrustedThirdParty@infosec.pub - !crypto@infosec.pub
Bluesky: natanael.bsky.social
Only applicable if they run the servers themselves, not if they let others run their own servers.
And “would leave rights holders liable” is completely false, no game would have offline modes if it did
The Pixel line is comparable to the Samsung S line, you got a budget phone before
If you’re talking about that mountain range, sure we can be Eurasia instead then
OTOH I only have a PS5 because of Sony’s marketing budget, lol (non-slim version included with a Sony phone on contract, so technically also a way for them to clear stock, lmao)
But yeah, I don’t know any people with a recent Xbox here in Sweden. In the original Xbox era and the 360 era I think they had a big lead here, but after that I’ve seen much more Sony represented.
Cars use stronger LIDAR lasers than the phones. The bigger range and faster response time requires it.
The only viable competition to LIDAR is structured light (see Leap Motion, there’s equivalent sensors for cars), which uses an IR source with patterned light and multiple high frame rate cameras to calculate depth from the reflections. In theory light field photography with special lenses is possible too, but far more computationally heavy for real-time use IIRC
There’s some safety issues with LIDAR at close range (it’s a laser! it can damage cameras, etc), which is basically the main reason to not use it. But Tesla are dumb enough to try to replace them with cameras alone, and not even using proper multi-camera techniques to calculate depth
Swede here.
Some American candy, mostly bad chocolate
Same thing with early studies on prime numbers
The judge explicitly did not allow piracy here. Only legally acquired media can be used for training.
This case didn’t cover the copyright status of outputs. The ruling so far is just about the process of training itself.
IMHO the generative ML companies should be required to build a process tracking the influence of distinct samples on the outputs, and inform users of potential licensing status
Division of liability / licensing responsibility should depend on who contributes what to the prompt / generation. The less it takes for the user to trigger the model to generate an output clearly derived from a protected work, the more liability lies on the model operator. If the user couldn’t have known, they shouldn’t be liable. If the user deliberately used jailbreaks, etc, the user is clearly liable.
But you get a weird edge case when users unknowingly copy prompts containing jailbreaks, though
The ruling explicitly does not allow pirating. It only lets you run ML training on legally acquired media.
They still haven’t ruled on copyright infringement from pirating the media used to train, and they haven’t ruled on copyright status of outputs (what it takes to be considered transformative).
This is judge Alsup, same guy who ruled in Oracle vs Google
Passable cotton candy stick, if you’re careful
I run a cryptography forum
Encryption doesn’t hide data sizes unless you take extra steps
It’s called traffic analysis
Timing of messages. They can’t tell what you send, but can tell when
You could tie it to requiring access to a digital ID (with password / PIN protection, etc), but yes kids could still “borrow” it
What you want is cryptographic Zero-knowledge proofs, not regular encryption. See anonymous credentials protocols.
And it does require every verifying entity to trust the issuer (each user could collect attestations from multiple issuers, to prove different things to different verifiers)
Another issue is the risk of deanonymization by verifiers simply asking for more proof of many different properties, until you can be identified anyway
No, copyright isn’t relinquished from any of that (not even any effect on damages if you still require players to have bought the game to use the private servers), and trademarks wouldn’t be affected at all if you simply require that 3rd party servers are marked as unofficial