deleted by creator

Eventually these corporations undergo trial by anti trust as their influence becomes increasingly toxic e.g. Google.

lol, feel free to let me know when any actual consequences come from that

The market has also increased 1000-times over, while simultaneously removing physical barriers entirely. The development itself is more expensive, sure, but distribution is way cheaper and the potential gains have increased at a much quicker rate, especially for smaller games.

But even then it’s astronomically unlikely to be retroactively enforced

It’s not unlikely, it’s literally impossible.

Did plex do something again

I’m sorry, but, without commas, this is just a mess, and I’m not going to torture myself into reading it.

That’s not at all how our financial system works

Yeah, because we’ve clearly shown that naturalization matters at all

Isn’t he pretty resoundingly useless? At least D has a cult of personality, Eric literally has nothing.

Anyone using basic HTML elements from the first HTML spec would still be supported in 99+% of cases today. HTML has added lots, and removed very, very, very little.

I think everyone can agree the no-html club is insane. Why not just a reduced version, so you can actually do stuff like links?

I have two kids and still game probably 3-4 nights/week, it’s just much shorter sessions. I’m not pulling full gaming days on the weekends anymore, I’m playing for an hour or so before bed.

I find that most people who say there isn’t enough time for gaming simply choose things like watching TV instead 🤷‍♂️ which is fine, to be clear, but it’s a choice

That. The content of the screenshot you posted. That is what’s going on.

You can have friends that are also coworkers, but you cannot have coworkers that are also friends - the “primary” relationship is important, IMO. If the primary reason we’re interacting is that we work together, there’s obviously no reason we can’t be friendly but we are not actually friends.

If your coworker is a coworker first and a friend second, why wouldn’t you pick a raise over them? Why wouldn’t you pick a promotion over them? Why wouldn’t you rather them out for something that negatively affects your job? At that point, it’s just a subjective scale for what you would do for the job and what might screw over your coworker.

It’s genuinely useful if you know how to use it 🤷‍♂️

More importantly, it’s the first real society-level paradigm shift since the internet, really, and provides the most effective platform for the rich to suck even more of the wealth up to the top of the system. They haven’t seen returns like this since the dotcom bubble.

I’d still take a dying Biden over this shit show, are you kidding me?

Sounds like you’re good? Maybe “C” is considered as the whole class of Cs: C+, C and C-

The real answer is “ask your advisor.” We can’t know all your uni’s silly rules, but they should.

If it doesn’t get funded, then hopefully someone with a less distasteful ideology forks it and starts fresh. Lemmy isn’t worth giving my money to people who want to enslave me.

The one I was originally linked to 🤷‍♂️ I have no loyalty to .world

If everyone on your team of 6 is 20% faster, you don’t necessarily need the 6th person. Maybe you put that towards more work, but that’s not very American, these days. Cut costs, cash out, fuck 'em