They will only be released when the files a properly curated and deemed ready to be consumed by republicans. A full playbook is being written as you read this for how it must go down to control the narrative. Either with catastrophe included or as a backup if it’s not working.
I would also like to speculate on their political affiliation
Didn’t they already do this? And found nothing?
I like how Jeffrey Epstein is around number 30 on his own list.
So not because trump is implicit in his closest friend for decades actions?
The point I’m making is Biden never campaigned on releasing the Epstein files. So it shouldn’t be surprising that he protected the people on the list. Trump did and his idiots fully expected him to release the list because he’s an honest person who keeps his promises. Trump knowingly and intentionally got votes from the psycho qanon types who have always believed trump is playing 4D chess.
It’s important to note that the goal posts have moved. Originally people wanted to see the “black book” which may be what the client list has come from. The black book got released and it’s got lots of people in it but it didn’t prove any crimes, only that he associated with them. People kept talking about it and believed it was being kept secret because nothing happens and no one got charged with anything. I believe the “client list” which appears to be a new idea, is directly talking about a list of people who the fbi have information on of committing crimes where Epstein supplied underaged girls to them.
The difference is the democrats didn’t campaign on the promise of releasing it. And MAGAs believed him for some weird reason
MAGA after Trump:
Calls his own daughter hot - “We don’t care”
Walking into a change room of underage girls and bragging about it - “We don’t care”
Blatant Fraud - “We don’t care”
Blackmail - “We don’t care”
Sexual Assault - “We don’t care”
Rape - “We don’t care”
And now we can definitively add:
Openly protecting a pedophile and pedophile ring - “We don’t care”
🤷🏾♂️ 🤷♀️ 🤷
These people think there is their truth and someone else’s truth. They can’t grasp the concept of a universal truth that is constant regardless of people’s views so they treat it like it’s up for grabs.
Let’s be honest, that poor excuse for a robotic monkey is a better and more loving patent than what most of us got.
All I’m saying is I’d be far more worried if it were the other way around
The only country with the ability to. If Iran or Hamas could they would too. They can’t because Israel is backed by the us. I find it troubling that people here have such a hard on for the underdog that they completely forget how shitty these other countries are just because there’s another shitty country doing shitty things to them. As if all these shitty things that are happening took place in a vacuum of Iran and Hamas dancing around rainbows and singing about love and peace. When two shitheads are fighting you don’t have to cheer for the one who is smaller or the one who didn’t start it. You can simply observe two shitheads fighting.
I should have added the /s I thought the stupidness of murdering someone then quickly asking for forgiveness and then being absolved of those awful crimes would be /s enough but I guess there really are people who think like that.
I’m sure Iran and hamas want to wipe out israel too
It’s obviously possible, you’d have to be a moron to not know that. But compared to if Iran or hamas had nukes I’m not as worried.
God forgives all who ask for forgiveness
Are you genuinely worried they will use their nukes?
In my language it’s called cheese
I’m not sure our idea of happiness aligns.
There’ll be a clause that banks are exempt