

You mean things you had to do anyway even if you didn’t use LLMs?
You mean things you had to do anyway even if you didn’t use LLMs?
Description generators for TTRPGs, as you will read through them afterwards anyway and correct when necessary.
Generating lists of ideas. For creative writing, getting a bunch of ideas you can pick and choose from that fit the narrative you want.
A search engine like Perplexity.ai which after searching summarizes the web page and adds a link to the page next to it. If the summary seems promising, you go to the real page to verify the actual information.
Simple code like HTML pages and boilerplate code that you will still review afterwards anyway.
Removed by mod
The comparison is about the correctness of their work.
Their lives have nothing to do with it.
Making games online is also additional time and money.
Businesses would bring back slavery if we let them.
When the sun shines in your eyes, do you not put on sunglasses? Cameras can’t do that.
When you have dirt in your eyes, do you not rub it out? Cameras can’t do that.
When something is obstructing your view, do you not move you head to the side until it is not? Cameras can’t do that.
Humans are much more than cameras and a brain.
And even if they were, shouldn’t we aim for something better than we currently have?
31.5°C also is just a bit slower at cooling, and computer devices easily reach 95°C without any troubles.
Maybe someone should write a new Art of War to explain to tech CEOs the basic ins and outs of technology development.
The basic shit every person working in the field understands. Except for the out-of-touch management. Call it the Art of Commerce or something.
They used to think that, but it is actually not that bad.
Like iterations with machine learning, you can train it with optimized output.
That isn’t the dumb part about this.
I believe it won’t work.
They would have to change so much info that won’t make a coherent whole. So many alternative facts that clash with so many other aspects of life. So asking about any of it would cause errors because of the many conflicts.
Sure it might work for a bit, but it would quickly degrade and will be so much slower than other models since it needs to error correct constantly.
An other thing is that their training data will also be very limited, and they would have to check every single other one thoroughly for “false info”. Increasing their manual labour.
Sure, and where is your proof that Bill needs one, let alone uses one?
And don’t come with a list of actions the majority of people don’t care about.
The charity did more than some good though.
Also, name one good historical person that didn’t do at least some bad.
It is almost like things aren’t black and white but more like Yin and Yang.
you should have a basic level of familiarity with the computer you’re using, same as any other tool
Obviously not, they can use it without that understanding just fine for whatever they want to do. That is enough understanding for them. If their computer explodes, they just buy an other one.
It is the perfect analogy, because you are a techy, not a survival hunter.
You buying at a grocery store is out of convenience, the alternative is learning how to hunt like a survival hunter.
Just like how the average user wants the convenience of easy to use software, because they don’t want to learn the alternative like you.
If everyone was like you, then easy to use software wouldn’t be selling so much.
Sure, but if you look at the top quality softwares, the majority of them are paid.
Because money is a big encouragement to make them as flawless as possible. Something FOSS just doesn’t have.
Think of the saved CO2 compared to writing an entire article!
With all the awful manipulation putin and the Russian state have done in the world play, I would be surprised if they didn’t have a hand in Hamas.
putin just kidnaps children and converts them to be Russian to fight in his wars.
So? That doesn’t mean they are supposed to be used like that.
Show me any marketing that isn’t full of lies.