US

Q1: people don’t trust the police

Q2: people don’t know what they want, but they do know they don’t trust the police.

Q3: This is a false premise. You can do both, but I am gathering you believe that the resulting “lawlessness” would be bad.

Q4: the best take is to reform police to the point that most do not carry firearms and are basically trained social workers. Firearms should be greatly regulated by a combination of insurance, technology, and psychological testing.

Q5: The concept that good guns cancel out bad guns is fantasy.

Q6: Yes, this can be done independently of whatever US decides to do with gun control

Can’t agree more.

“the grift”

The Nazi went around the world looking for countries to take in the Jews. The US refused and then the wealthy business men that funded the Nazi party lobbied the rest of the world not to take in the Jews either. History shows us we were worse than the Nazi. It is a bitter pill to swallow

No, similar models and current builds without the “prompt” do not do this. This is just Muskrat forcing Nazism through a hidden prompt. Something like don’t be woke, it is okay to offend people, and freedom of speech is more important than hate speech.

The Nazi looked up to the US. They loved how we slaughtered the Native Americans and based their Holocaust on our policies. Wealthy people from the US were integral to funding the Nazi party.

You do the math.

AI might be a convenient excuse but it is my understanding this all relates to a change in US tax code that no longer allows a company to write off research and development.

Projection, it is secretly what they wanted the whole time.

Ummm no! Our drones have crosses on them because Jesus is king.

This is just GIGO.

The US gave Israel, an evil state, nuclear weapons. By your logic…

Pretty much this and the answer is nothing. This is the world we have created where people are murdered just because. We are the ultimate terrorist.

It takes a special type of shithead to threaten peoples’ jobs to their face without even knowing what the fuck they are talking about.

Propping up gas prices so the Russian economy won’t crash.

Oh lol, there is no trust between the US and Iran. We have been fucking them over and murdering their people for a long time now

I know you are willfully being ignorant here as AI data centers are projected to use more electricity than the entire nation of Japan by 2030.

Your own hosted LLM is not the problem nor the issue we are even discussing and quite frankly a little insulting you bring it up

I am not anymore anti-AI than any tool that you can’t determine is accurate nor correct if there is an issue with it. LLM have a long way to go before they are even a fraction of what they claim to be.

Another problem is they do not cite where they get their answers from. Without the ability to audit the answers you are given you won’t know how accurate they are.

I have listed several legitimate gripes about LLM. I find your fanboism misplaced and I think you are just playing devil’s advocate at this point. AI is a hype train and I am sick of it already.

It takes an enormous amount of energy and processing power to create these shitty snapshots so in many ways it is doom considering it will dramatically increase our energy usage.

I get it, you are an AI supporter but you fail to critically analyze it or even understand it. What tool would you use that you can’t correct errors to or even determine how it works. You are really operating on faith here that the black box your getting an answer from is giving you the correct answer.

Perhaps a code snippet works, but after this is where it all falls apart. What if the snippet does not work or causes a problem. The LLM has nothing to offer you here.

LLM are poor snapshots of a search engine with no way to fix any erroneous data. If you search something on Stack you get the page with several people providing snippets and debating the best approach. The LLM does not give you this. Furthermore if the author goes back and fixes an error in their code the search will find it whereas the LLM will give you the buggy code with no way to reasonably update it

LLM have major issues and even bigger limitations. Pretending they are some panacea is going to disappoint.

Woah man, are you like saying public safety officers should like be safe and protect people. This could like totally revolutionize police work!

There is a huge difference between an algorithm using real world data to produce a score a panel of experts use to make a determination and using a LLM to screen candidates. One has verifiable reproducible results that can be checked and debated the other does not.

The final call does not matter if a computer program using an unknown and unreproducible algorithm screens you out before this. This is what we are facing. Pre-determined decisions that human beings are not being held accountable to.

Is this happening right now? Yes it is, without a doubt. People are no longer making a lot of healthcare decisions determining insurance coverage. Computers that are not accountable are. You may have some ability to disagree but for how long?

Soon there will be no way to reach a human about an insurance decision. This is already happening. People should be very anxious. Hearing United Healthcare has been forging DNRs and has been denying things like treatment for stroke for elders is disgusting. We have major issues that are not going away and we are blatantly ignoring them.