

That’s exactly it. NPR will go on, but local, small market, broadcasters who receive as much as half of their funding from this, will be severely affected. Rural America will be the biggest loser here.
That’s exactly it. NPR will go on, but local, small market, broadcasters who receive as much as half of their funding from this, will be severely affected. Rural America will be the biggest loser here.
Wait, what? I admit it’s not peer-reviewed, but it’s hardly pseudo-science. I even shared a gift article. Also, it was written by Alice Callahan who is a Times reporter covering nutrition and health and she has a Ph.D. in nutrition from the University of California, Davis.
Zero shame and brain cells
Haha typically no
They cost far more (whereas physical books are heavily discounted for libraries), they have licensing terms (limited circ or time period), and there’s the issue of hosting perpetual access materials. Physical books are just cheap, durable, and most importantly yours to do whatever you want with them (donate them, sell them, make crafts with them, etc.).
Certainly not for public libraries
5-story Brownstown is not an apartment
Bullshit. He is looking for a deal, just not one that is favourable to both parties.
One step forward, two steps back.
I buy bananas all the time. Bananas are dirt cheap and I imagine they are dirt cheap because the labor costs are so low. I feel like I will be financially okay if I had to pay an extra dollar for a bundle of bananas.
Probably the same thing they want from Ukraine.
Cool crime
Starmer chooses to learn - what everyone already knows - the hard way
My favourite Vergecast segment 😁
Brendan Carr is not a smart man
True, but not all libraries have auto-renewal circ policies in place
Shouldn’t be too long, most libraries have a 4-wk lending period.
The library should be taking this douches nozzle to collections, and replacing the destroyed materials.
Sorry, I haven’t a clue.