“Alligator Auschwitz”.

Because most of their big money donors are also on the list.

This is intentional.

Didn’t the judge specifically state that they were not allowed to do this? Isn’t this the entire reason they had to bring him back?

We are so far past the point of this being a Constitutional crisis. When is someone going to say, enough is enough?

For decades, we’ve been fed this narrative that overpopulation is eventually going to destroy the world. But, now that birthrates are declining…a shrinking population is suddenly the problem.

These people need a ton of therapy.

But, totally not politically motivated. At all.

Two sides of the same coin.

If AI can replace so many people that there aren’t jobs for them all, wouldn’t that also mean AI is producing enough to sustain those people, jobs or not?

Unfortunately, that isn’t what’s happening. AI isn’t “producing” anything that people need to survive. It’s just replacing people. We aren’t seeing any net gains to society that would be able to support so many people no longer being needed in the workforce.

If they were training AI to produce food, build housing or anything that people actually need more of right now, I would say you are absolutely correct to assume that people would be just fine with this transition. But that’s not what they’re using AI for.

Optimistically, AI could and definitely should be used for those things…and the logical conclusion would be to implement a form of UBI so that we can all benefit from this. But do you honestly see that happening?

I don’t. And I think that’s what OP is also seeing. We aren’t ready, as a species, to make that transition yet. There isn’t even the slightest intention on behalf of our current leadership, of providing for an entire population of jobless people. They will ultimately be left to fend for themselves. And as it stands right now, society isn’t equipped to function with that kind of excess population.

It’s not necessary about their “value” to society. People need to eat in order to survive. That means having a way of supporting themselves. Having no way of supporting themselves means a lot of people are going to die.

I’d say that’s a net negative to society.

And the problem runs deeper than “retraining” or “upskilling”. With the emergence of technologies that replace human workers…there will simply be a massive excess of unemployed workers hitting the market. Period. Skills or not. Where are they going to work, when there are now ten people applying for every available job?

Lol! What the actual fuck? No.

(settles back and puts feet up with a giant bowl of popcorn)

This is why you can’t have rational conversations with Americans.

This is the biggest endorsement Mamdani could get. I hope New Yorkers are paying attention.

So much for Trump being all about transparency.

But I thought they just made it illegal to regulate AI? Oh, wait…that was just for the states. Fuck those guys.

At some point, I would hope people start to recognize the negative impact this has on American politics, and simply reject candidates who are being funded by foreign influence campaigns. It should be a matter of principle.

How does anyone consider him a “genius”? This guy is just so stupid.

Or Obama.

the president’s decision to strike was not driven by any new U.S. intelligence on Iran.

FTFY.