I instead recommend using more productive languages. I’ve heard many good things about Rust, if you can deal with the OCaml-like syntax and the functional paradigm by default. As an alternative I can also recommend D, it doesn’t have the “const by default” issue of Rust (functional paradigm is still possible, you just have to opt-in), a very C-like syntax except more refined, memory safety features (3 levels of memory safety + arrays with bounds checking), at the cost of a bit hard to opt-out garbage collector (you also have to opt-out from many D features and the already scarce library ecosystem).
This will just lead to more low-quality code.
I instead recommend using more productive languages. I’ve heard many good things about Rust, if you can deal with the OCaml-like syntax and the functional paradigm by default. As an alternative I can also recommend D, it doesn’t have the “
constby default” issue of Rust (functional paradigm is still possible, you just have to opt-in), a very C-like syntax except more refined, memory safety features (3 levels of memory safety + arrays with bounds checking), at the cost of a bit hard to opt-out garbage collector (you also have to opt-out from many D features and the already scarce library ecosystem).