In a populous city in southeast Virginia, a Republican sheriff who calls himself “Detain ’Em Dave” is in a race to the right against a GOP challenger who wants more immigration enforcement. No Democrat or independent has filed to run.
I’m not defending the DNC at all, but it is a tough process. Running candidates that lose takes a toll. The candidate is putting themselves at risk, painting a target on their backs, and they have to be passionate and persuasive in their campaign knowing they are going to lose.
Conservatives are much better at it, primarily because Conservative losers aren’t afraid of being lynched, and they’re permitted to say whatever bat shit nonsense happens to rattle around in their skull. They aren’t required to be consistent or nuanced or honest, so finding sacrificial nazis in progressive regions isn’t that hard. Chances are, people in the community already know who they are and what they stand for because bigots aren’t usually quiet.
Progressives have to actually make an argument, one that resonates and establishes a foothold for reason. It’s like climbing a muddy slope. Conservatives don’t need to reach the summit, they just want to stop you from getting there.
Oh I agree with you. I’m just saying it’s far easier to find crazy people willing to spout nonsense than it is to find a reasonable, persuasive person who is willing and able to shout into the void.
I think your argument is sound, but it fails to take into account the disproportionate funding between the sides. A dem needs to run on their own dollar while the mediocre GOP influencer can get set for life money from the Russians.
That’s also a fair point. Oligarchs aren’t seeking out shady methods of funneling money to candidates to run progressive campaigns. In general, money always has motivation, which is one of the reasons Citizens United was so catastrophic.
I’m not defending the DNC at all, but it is a tough process. Running candidates that lose takes a toll. The candidate is putting themselves at risk, painting a target on their backs, and they have to be passionate and persuasive in their campaign knowing they are going to lose.
Conservatives are much better at it, primarily because Conservative losers aren’t afraid of being lynched, and they’re permitted to say whatever bat shit nonsense happens to rattle around in their skull. They aren’t required to be consistent or nuanced or honest, so finding sacrificial nazis in progressive regions isn’t that hard. Chances are, people in the community already know who they are and what they stand for because bigots aren’t usually quiet.
Progressives have to actually make an argument, one that resonates and establishes a foothold for reason. It’s like climbing a muddy slope. Conservatives don’t need to reach the summit, they just want to stop you from getting there.
It’s also bloody expensive.
but the controlled opposition
democratsgot a billion in fundsI hear you, but I also feel its shortsighted.
The end result is somebody like MGT - who knows she’ll never have to defend herself in a race, so she goes way off the deep end.
The party is missing opportunities to tell their side of things and challenge the utter nonsense many GOP candidates spew.
Oh I agree with you. I’m just saying it’s far easier to find crazy people willing to spout nonsense than it is to find a reasonable, persuasive person who is willing and able to shout into the void.
I think your argument is sound, but it fails to take into account the disproportionate funding between the sides. A dem needs to run on their own dollar while the mediocre GOP influencer can get set for life money from the Russians.
That’s also a fair point. Oligarchs aren’t seeking out shady methods of funneling money to candidates to run progressive campaigns. In general, money always has motivation, which is one of the reasons Citizens United was so catastrophic.