

I was wondering this myself but I don’t want to give them any ideas
I was wondering this myself but I don’t want to give them any ideas
Adobe creative suite, most cad software, games (work with Proton already so little need for this), etc.
At some point companies will be forced to accept that they’re losing out on revenue by not releasing a linux version of their software.
Huh, why didn’t I think of that? Thanks
I’m still amazed you can draw something on your computer and physically print it into reality. I do agree that layer lines can look pretty cool.
Oh, yeah, it’s gonna be a little rough around the edges. I don’t really mind layer lines, but if you want a perfect product you’re going to have to put in some design work to get it to that level and have a good printer for it.
I swear I spend more time prioritising and decising when to release my fixes than actually making them
Idk I have a $300 printer upstairs and you totally can just print stuff on it immediately. The days of super expensive (money and/or time) printers is past.
I want to be able to open a line of communication to another driver nearby. Maybe a range of 100ft. I don’t know if it’s Bluetooth or what. “Hey your taillight is out” “hey coming up in your blindspot” “hey, please can I merge I’m not trying to be a dick” “hey is this the exit for Wawa?”
I think about this every time I’m on the highway, it would be so fun/useful.
It’s also nice to not have to put energy into it
Article title writer pictured here
BREAKING: Water wet
Just get an even worse song stuck in your head, like this one: https://youtu.be/lrPncVUR_3Y
Undertale also has really bad code and it’s a great game
My point is that the way that you stick two real numbers together to make a complex number is important, and is unintuitive if you approach it as just two real numbers.
With what flour? :/
Has anyone figuted out how long it will take for this to affect our food supply? Surely at least prices will increase, if not outright shortages happen?
I’m being combative because I don’t get how you don’t understand our argument, and because I view claims like “You keep claiming things that are objectively false” to be hostile when they stem from a misunderstanding rather than a fault on my part.
Let me restate my main point: complex numbers can be defined as vectors with the necessary rules to define various operations, such as multiplication over them and how they relate to sqrt(-1). Those additional rules are just as important to their definition as their appearance as two real-numbered values is. Both vectors and complex numbers are defined by humans, but we have chosen to give them separate definitions, because each definition includes the rules defining these operations and relationships, and they are different between the two types of mathematical object.
And, for the record, I downvoted your posts that were hostile (not all of them) and responded in kind. It’s a separate effort than trying to prove my point here.
Congrats!